Reframing Delegated Authority strategy for a portfolio-first market
Published:
Insights into what must change in operating model deployment to turn DA growth into sustainable underwriting performance.
Delegated Authority now represents a significant share of global premium and continues to grow faster than much of the traditional insurance market. Yet in many organisations it still sits awkwardly within the operating model. Treated as a distribution channel or governance burden rather than a distinct underwriting strategy it often lacks clear ownership defined objectives or meaningful performance measurement. This creates tension between growth ambition and execution capability particularly as market conditions begin to soften and the margin for operational inefficiency narrows.
DA's strategic position
What is changing is the way DA is being positioned within underwriting portfolios. Rather than acting purely as an access route to new business it is increasingly being viewed as a mechanism for capital diversification innovation sourcing or portfolio-level optimisation. Growth in alternative capital participation and hybrid capacity models is expanding the ecosystem beyond traditional insurer MGA relationships. Organisations are being forced to make explicit choices about where they deploy capital whether they lead or follow and how DA aligns with broader underwriting appetite rather than competes with it.

Operationally this has direct implications for underwriting workflow and delegated oversight. Decision-making moves from individual risk assessment towards partner performance evaluation across portfolios. Oversight becomes less about transactional compliance and more about understanding aggregated value volatility or diversification benefit. Claims operations also become dependent on externalised processes or data access. Integration across onboarding bordereaux ingestion audit or reporting increasingly determines decision-making speed and portfolio responsiveness.
Key challenges
Where organisations are getting stuck is in the translation from strategy to delivery. Legacy architecture remains a consistent constraint particularly where insurer systems are designed to process individual risks rather than delegated portfolios. Fragmented data requirements create duplication across onboarding audit or reporting workflows. Governance processes often extend onboarding timelines to the point where the underwriting opportunity has shifted by the time authority is granted. Ownership of economic outcomes is also frequently unclear. Many firms can model acquisition cost yet struggle to articulate the true value contribution of DA business to capital return or balance sheet performance.
Culturally this is compounded by internal perceptions of channel conflict. Delegated business is still sometimes viewed as competing with traditional underwriting teams rather than complementing them. In practice the diversification effect of writing both delegated and direct business in the same line can improve return stability. Without a clearly articulated DA strategy supported by its own performance framework, this value remains invisible at team level which makes alignment difficult.
The strategic implication is that DA requires explicit operating model design rather than accommodation within existing structures. This may include dedicated P&L ownership revised partner remuneration models that reflect early-stage investment risk or clearer articulation of underwriting appetite across delegated and direct channels. Technology investment decisions also shift. Where partners have already invested in onboarding quoting or analytics capability duplication at insurer level adds cost without improving oversight unless data requirements are redefined.

As organisations prepare for more portfolio-driven underwriting models the focus is likely to move from process optimisation towards ecosystem connectivity. The next phase will depend less on improving individual workflows and more on defining what data is required when it is required or how it supports capital allocation decisions across the delegated portfolio. Firms that can align strategy governance and economic measurement around that outcome will be better placed to convert delegated growth into sustained underwriting performance.
If you would like to take part in ongoing Delegated Authority discussions across the market you can join peers at the Delegated Authority Strategy Day taking place on April 23rd in London.
Sign Up to TINsights
Where we share our latest blogs, industry reports and insights

